Random Thursday: Elementary, My Dear Random

My husband and, appropriately enough, Watson sent me some of these things this past week. I had the rest tucked away for just such a random occasion.
_______________________________

Egg-lamentary, my dear

Eggsactly

You’ll be relieved to know I’ve worked all the eggs puns out of my system.

Uuntil next year.

ooooooooooooooooOOOOOoooooooooooooooo

Elements of my dear

I knew about the first and third one, but not the rest

Number four is odd—why  give a character a fellowship for using forensics in popular literature, instead of the author?

Then again, characters are often more familiar to the public than their creators—and Sherlock’s popularity has been insane since his stories were first published.

I was discussing this with friends when someone at another table leaned in and said:

“Maybe they just gave the  fellowship thing to Sherlock because they can’t give it to a living person.  What?  Sir Conan Doyle is dead, right?”

Well, yes, but . . .

Not So Sherlock

ooooooooooooooooOOOOOoooooooooooooooo

Periodically, my dear

Periodically Watson

Qwertee had these available of tee-shirts, but they ended the run already.

I’m hoping it earns enough votes so they’ll do another batch before my birthday—or Watson’s.

ooooooooooooooooOOOOOoooooooooooooooo

Duh, my dear

Sherlock V Batman

My husband sent me this—Batman is his like Sherlock Holmes is mine.

Though I don’t think he’s quite so fixated on aware of, say, Christian Bale’s cheekbones.

ooooooooooooooooOOOOOoooooooooooooooo

Alimentary, my dear . . . Never mind

I only included this because I could make a  horrible pun out of it.

I regret nothing.

Poetry Wednesday: Sherlockian Serendipity

It’s no secret that I adore Sherlock Holmes.  Well before Benedict Cumberbatch’s cheekbones, Robert Downey Jr.’s intensity, Martin Freeman’s steadfast smile, and Jude Law’s . . . everything . . .I devoured the stories, diving head first into the Victorian age and trying so hard to figure out whodunnit and how.  And now that I know perfectly well what the speckled band is and why the red-headed league isn’t, I read them for inspiration and comfort.

Lifelong fan, me, with a small tattoo, perhaps, to prove it.

It stands to reason, if not ratiocination, that I’m also a bit of an Arthur Conan Doyle fan as well.  I find it fascinating that he was a doctor, a ship’s surgeon, and, for many years, a struggling writer—he was more Watson than Holmes, which I think puts a special spin on things.*

A lot of people don’t seem to know that he wrote a lot of stuff—successful stuff—thatdidn’t feature a consulting detective, including The Lost World, a story that did for dinosaurs what Holmes did for mysteries, and The Exploits of Brigadier Gerard, which features an insufferable main character and proved that a vain, self-centered, infuriating hero can be fascinating to read.

So why am I telling you all this on a Wednesday?

Because a few days ago, this showed up in my inbox—a late birthday present from a friend who kindly thought I already knew:

A Parable
(Arthur Conan Doyle)

The cheese-mites asked how the cheese got there,
    And warmly debated the matter;
The Orthodox said that it came from the air,
    And the Heretics said from the platter.
They argued it long and they argued it strong,
    And I hear they are arguing now;
But of all the choice spirits who lived in the cheese,
    Not one of them thought of a cow.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote poetry, y’all.

Not a lot, apparently, and to be honest—and completely subjective—this is the best of them.  “A Parable” tickles me because it shows the same biting humor I enjoy from his prose, but most of his poems are Victorian standards about God and England—not that I’m knocking either subject, but I don’t find his verses particularly remarkable, much as I respect the man.**

But he did write it, amid all the other stuff he did, and that’s awesome.  I think it’s even better that it wasn’t that great.

This does make for a shorter post than usual, but don’t breathe a sigh of relief just yet, because I would be remiss in my duties as a Doyle fan if I didn’t mention another Doyle fan who happened to be a fantastic poet.

T.S. Eliot was such a fan of Sherlock Holmes that he supposedly memorized great long passages from the stories and bet a friend that he could remembered every single character Doyle put into his stories.***

Which asks the question: can a minor character created for the sole purpose of killing off a main character in a set of popular magazine stories really influence a poet of Mr. Eliot’s caliber?

Macavity—The Mystery Cat
(T. S. Eliot)

Macavity’s a Mystery Cat: he’s called the Hidden Paw—
For he’s the master criminal who can defy the Law.
He’s the bafflement of Scotland Yard, the Flying Squad’s despair:
For when they reach the scene of crime—Macavity’s not there!

Macavity, Macavity, there’s no on like Macavity,
He’s broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity.
His powers of levitation would make a fakir stare,
And when you reach the scene of crime—Macavity’s not there!
You may seek him in the basement, you may look up in the air–
But I tell you once and once again, Macavity’s not there!

Macavity’s a ginger cat, he’s very tall and thin;
You would know him if you saw him, for his eyes are sunken in.
His brow is deeply lined with thought, his head is highly doomed;
His coat is dusty from neglect, his whiskers are uncombed.
He sways his head from side to side, with movements like a snake;
And when you think he’s half asleep, he’s always wide awake.

Macavity, Macavity, there’s no one like Macavity,
For he’s a fiend in feline shape, a monster of depravity.
You may meet him in a by-street, you may see him in the square—
But when a crime’s discovered, then Macavity’s not there!

He’s outwardly respectable. (They say he cheats at cards.)
And his footprints are not found in any file of Scotland Yard’s.
And when the larder’s looted, or the jewel-case is rifled,
Or when the milk is missing, or another Peke’s been stifled,
Or the greenhouse glass is broken, and the trellis past repair–
Ay, there’s the wonder of the thing! Macavity’s not there!

And when the Foreign Office finds a Treaty’s gone astray,
Or the Admiralty lose some plans and drawings by the way,
There may be a scap of paper in the hall or on the stair—
But it’s useless of investigate—Macavity’s not there!
And when the loss has been disclosed, the Secret Service say:
“It must have been Macavity!”—but he’s a mile away.
You’ll be sure to find him resting, or a-licking of his thumbs,
Or engaged in doing complicated long division sums.

Macavity, Macavity, there’s no one like Macacity,
There never was a Cat of such deceitfulness and suavity.
He always has an alibi, or one or two to spare:
And whatever time the deed took place—MACAVITY WASN’T THERE!
And they say that all the Cats whose wicked deeds are widely known
(I might mention Mungojerrie, I might mention Griddlebone)
Are nothing more than agents for the Cat who all the time
Just controls their operations: the Napoleon of Crime!

I really couldn’t say.^

It’s no mystery (see what I did there?) that Edgar Allen Poe’s three, brilliant stories about C. Auguste Dupin—narrated by the associate of the genius Frenchman, who used deductive reasoning to solve crimes— had a terrific influence on Doyle.  So, for the sake of this post and my own curiosity, I searched long and hard for a Poe poem that celebrated the logic of the mind—but with the exception of Dupin, Poe really, seriously, gothically, wasn’t into that.

So I’m rounding this post off with a poem that directly celebrates Sherlock Holmes and John Watson, and also the kind of characters and stories that for whatever reason are so loved that they become more than themselves.

Vincent Starrett was a member of the Beacon Society—part of the Baker Street Irregulars, which is dedicated to introducing young people to Sherlock Holmes.  His poem was written in 1942, when the world had turned dangerous and home no longer meant a safe refuge.

221B
(Vincent Starrett)

Here dwell together still two men of note
Who never lived and so can never die:
How very near they seem, yet how remote
That age before the world went all awry.
But still the game’s afoot for those with ears
Attuned to catch the distant view-halloo:
England is England yet, for all our fears—
Only those things the heart believes are true.

A yellow fog swirls past the window-pane
As night descends upon this fabled street:
A lonely hansom splashes through the rain,
The ghostly gas lamps fail at twenty feet.
Here, though the world explode, these two survive,
And it is always eighteen ninety-five.

I know Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wasn’t always happy that Sherlock Holmes overshadowed his other work, and I don’t know if that included his poetry . . . but I’ll bet he wouldn’t have minded a bit that his stories inspired poetry in others.

And I’m certain Sherlock wouldn’t have.

___________

*We shall not speak of fairies, thank you, though if anyone earned the right to believe in them, he did, and who cares?

** Though there is one about a yew bow (and God and England) that’s fun.  I suspect it was written as a drinking song either for or in remembrance of his years aboard a whaler and an exploration ship before returning to England.  I may be wrong . . . but I hope not.

***Apparently he couldn’t, quite, but we’ll forgive him because he admitted it, laughed at himself, and he was, after all, T.S. Eliot.

^But I will say that fanfiction isn’t new, people, and there are diamonds amid the dross.

___________

The ownership of all poems are retained by their respective estates. 

Images are courtesy of Microsoft and other creative commons sources.

Eliminating the Impossible . . .

After several years of thinking about tattoos, I finally made two decisions:  Since words reflect who I am far more than images ever have, I wanted a literary tattoo—and I would get it done before my next birthday.

I narrowed the choices—so, so many choices—down to three, and spent more time than is strictly sane on FontSpace, downloading and experimenting, apparently willing to spend the next fifteen years tinkering.

And then life dropped me a wake-up call or three.

The day I learned the results of my biopsy, I started looking for an artist.

If you’re going to be tattooed for the first time, I highly recommended taking my SIL with you—she let me drag her all over the place, looking at portfolios and policies and general cleanliness and she leaps in when the artist asks you what you want done and your brains freezes up because oh, my God you’re actually going to do this.*

I made an appointment at one place with an artist whose portfolio showed beautiful lettering and I wanted her to do the Big One—but she isn’t free until June, so we kept looking around, just to see.

Yesterday, we had lunch out and decided to stop by a nearby studio.  The girl at the desk told us that there weren’t any artists available, but that one was subbing for the piercer and could at least talk to me about what I wanted done.

While we were waiting for him to finish in the sterilization room—which I thought was a comforting sign—we wandered around to look at the  photographed work on the walls.  It all looked good, especially a selection of portraits in a single frame.

A few minutes later, a guy with a friendly smile and extensive sleeve art came out of the back and asked me what I thinking about.

I told him was thinking of having a phrase from one of my favorite quotes done and showed him on my laptop.**

“What is that from?” he asked.  “It looks really familiar.”

I told him the rest.  “It’s from a Sherlock Holmes story.”

He broke out into this huge grin.  “Yeah! I remember —man, I love Sherlock Holmes.  My dad’s a huge fan, too—we watched all those old movies together!  Which font?”

I told him, and he started laughing.  “That’s excellent.

And I knew I’d found my artist—even before I learned those portraits were his.

He checked with the owner to see if he could tattoo me that day and got the go ahead.  Then he walked me through it and we worked out the placement, alignment, and size together—his enthusiasm is completely contagious.  He also answered all my questions, some of which had nothing to do with the matter at hand, since I tend to go all scattershot when I’m nervous.  But he was terrifically patient, kind, and gentle to this newbie.

And he does fantastic work.

So, here it is:***

When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
—Sherlock Holmes, “Sign of the Four” (Arthur Conan Doyle)

Done in a slightly tweaked Old Baskerville font.

I love it.

____________________

*She also keeps you distracted in all kinds of inventive ways while the actual tattooing is going on, including a soft shoe routine that I can’t possibly describe.

**Something I also recommend bringing for a text-based tattoo, along with a flash drive for easy transfer to the artist’s software, if s/he’ll be using any.  I had no fears about misspellings and he was able to see what I wanted and modify from there.  Saved us a lot of time.

***Looking grayer than it really is, because I took the photo.  The ink is black.

Random Thursday

This morning, at the breakfast table:

 Sunny (standing up on her chair):  I’m done.  Get me down.

Daddy:  You have to have more than one piece of melon for breakfast.

Sunny (leaning on him to put her cheek to his):  But I want to sit with you.

DaddyIf you sit with me, will you eat your breakfast?

Sunny:  (already in Daddy’s lap): Uh-huh.

Daddy: Okay, have a bite of toast.

Sunny (burying her face in Daddy’s shirt and hugging him like a four-legged python):  Nooooo!

Daddy:  You said you’d—

Sunny (muffled):  You’re the best daddy in the whole world.

Me:  You’re a born grifter, kid.

Daddy (trying to pry small hands from his shirt so he can turn her around):  She’s a born gripper.

Tomato, tomahto . . .

oooOOOooo

 Another time suck, courtesy of the gang over at SBTB:

The McCord Museum in Montreal, which I must visit someday with the kids, has a fantastic website that includes some brilliant online games. They’ve even devised a game that lets players accumulate points while improving the museum’s search engine by adding tags to items in the collections!

So far, my favorite is the Victorian game,* which has you dealing with four different venues as a male or female, selecting outfits and answering questions about proper manners.  It’s fascinating.

Be careful when you visit the ladies room on the train, by the way – that older lady has a temper.

 oooOOOooo


Opportunities in professional and peer feedback!

Suzie Townsend of  Fine Print and Joanna Stampfel-Volpe of Nancy Coffey are now offering first page critiques, à la Janet Reid’s QueryShark.  They’re calling it First Page Shooter.

Directions on how to submit the first 250 words of your work are available here.

Not all submissions will be critiqued, but professional criticism of other people’s work can be incredibly helpful, so even if you don’t wish to participate, you might want to check the feature out anyway.

oooOOOooo


Just found out one of my favorite mystery authors, Laurie R. King, is going to Bouchercon!

She’s the author of the excellent Kate Martinelli series as well as many single novels, but my heart belongs to her Mary Russell and Sherlock Holmes novels.

When Mary Russell is fifteen, she literally stumbles over a reclusive beekeeper, one Sherlock Holmes, in the English countryside.  Both are lonely, damaged, and brilliant, and they forge a strong bond of friendship that the most insidious of villains—or Sherlock’s infamous moods—can’t break.

This version of Sherlock Holmes is set after the classic stories.  The premise is that John Watson showed his journals to Arthur Conan Doyle, who wrote the cases down—though never to Holmes’ satisfaction.  It’s mentioned that Doyle aged the ”characters” for the sake of believability, which neatly explains why Sherlock is not yet in his dotage in 1915, when he meets Mary.  This also allows for subtle cameos by Lord Peter Whimsy and a few other Wonders of the Literary World—and why not?

Another example of Ms. King’s meta-brilliance:  One of the Russell-Holmes books, Locked Rooms, takes place in California and is almost entirely Mary’s story, as it involves a mystery in her own family.  Holmes is off-page for an extended period of time, without much explanation to the reader.

However, if that reader were to pick up the Kate Martinelli book, The Art of Detection, they would find Kate trying to solve a murder connected to a newly discovered Sherlock Holmes story.   Most experts seem convinced that the story is a fake—Sir Arthur Conan Doyle would never have set a  Holmes story  in California or written a first-person account of how Sherlock spent his time while his ‘partner’ was involved in her own case.

How’s that for an inside joke?


____________

*There’s also a Roaring ‘Twenties role-playing game, but I’ve discovered that the Canadian ‘twenties were slightly different from the ones I learned about in my Ohio public school.